Do you know who @I am?

September 9, 2009


Everybody loves a good “social media lets @everyperson take down a corporate Goliath” story. I enjoyed seeing Dave Carroll take an indifferent United Airlines to task for breaking his guitar and quickly soar to over 5MM views and major media coverage. There are plenty of stories validating that a complaint aired on Twitter gets quick attention, and it was funny to see Horizon Realty’s cluelessness in attempting to respond to a ‘libelous’ tweet.

But there’s a dark side to social media’s ability to break down barriers. I was delighted that Heather B. Armstrong finally got her Maytag washing machine fixed. I don’t begrudge her tweeting about it, or even asking the customer service rep “do you know what Twitter is.” Because it sounds like she had a terrible experience and an awful day, and I’d probably have tweeted it too. So where’s the dark side?

Well, Heather (a.k.a. @Dooce)  has over a million followers on Twitter. As great as it is that anyone can tweet their dissatisfaction, “some animals are more equal than others”, to quote Orwell. With about 1K followers, I might or might not get as quick or satisfactory a response as she did. And I know plenty of folks with less than a hundred Twitter followers because they’re in it for reasons other than amassing followers. I’m not sure that this new stratification – based on social media-enabled connections rather than family connections, political clout, or good old-fashioned wealth – is better than old styles of stratification.

Recently a customer had an issue signing up for service at the company where I work, and he contacted us about it. When I saw that his title was “social media strategist”, I picked up the phone just a little more quickly than I might have otherwise. I felt exactly as I felt about giving extra attentive service to the local millionaire or celebrity back in my bartending days.

Anyone at the top of the new stratification may disagree and claim that they’ve earned their clout through hard work – and you can do the same, if you’re willing to work for it. There’s some truth to that nouveau riche-sounding claim, but I’m pretty sure most of us won’t equal Ashton Kutcher or even Heather Armstrong with any amount of effort. And so, quicker than we might like, social capital is in the hands of the social capitalists, and we get back to that old question “Do you know who I am?”

Anyone who’s ever felt privilege – even the temporary privilege of drinking for free because your band is hot at the moment – believes that they’ve earned it through their hard work, natural talent or smarts. Should I accept that the invisible hand is allocating whuffie as fairly as Adam Smith believed it allocated wealth? Am I just having an uncharacteristically negative evening? Am I  searching for the cloud in the social media silver lining? Am I simply envious? I’m not sure I’ll like the answers to those questions. But I’m hitting ‘Publish’ regardless.

Photo by irLordy


2 Responses to “Do you know who @I am?”

  1. @michaelpearsun Says:

    Hey Russ,

    Really Good Stuff here! I love this line of thinking. Where to start??

    First, I wanted to hit upon the ability for one of us to become a @dooce. Ok, so this will never happen to most people, I completely agree but the likely hood that someone that will become a millionaire or famous is about the same as me become the next @copyblogger or @problogger. Actually when I say it out loud, I think I have a better chance of making it rich than becoming on of those guys. They were and are innovators and I think I am too far behind to amass the flock they have. So I guess, yes, they are privileged social media / web celebrity types that 99% of us will never become. So yes it is unfair that @dooce has such reach; whereas my mom would have to scream from the highest mountain top to receive a modicum of service.

    One another side of the coin is social media is about leveraging your connections and marrying good fits, customer service and a lot about finding influencers / connectors. If a company or person is deals with someone that is a leader or an influencer of a group that they are focused on, they will surely receive some special treatment. Why should it be any different from politics? There has always been lobbyist. There has always been constitutes. Leaders and influencers were always the glue that kept the business of moving ideas together.

    Before influencers / connectors were not easily located by their twitter following or facebook friends but even before this, people knew about finding influencers. They might have been forward looking but now it is just simple and easy to calculate whereas before it was a purely “word of mouth” and who you know.

    In the old days it was people calling or letting other people know “you gotta know this person.” Now it is tattooed on preferred social platforms. This is still far from ubiquitous. Businesses need to consider the “good to know people” that are still not participating in social media. So my question to you:

    How would you go about finding connector / influencers without considering social platforms? What would your guidelines be?

  2. rsomers Says:

    Thanks Michael! Your comments make me think that social media (as with most technology) doesn’t change human behavior so much as it amplifies and facilitates it. This all takes me back to my Sociology undergrad, many years back…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: